2/8/2024 0 Comments Jordanetics vox dayUnfortunately, much of the first third of Jordanetics supplies little additional material. For those who have had a passing interest in Vox’s critiques of Peterson, the video projects and various streams he’s given on the subject over the past year or so provide decent background. The first third of the work is concerned with dispelling accusations of jealousy, recounting anecdotes regarding the vivacity of Peterson’s cultish fandom, and detailing the slow migration away from the man that so many of his fans eventually undertake. Vox’s book aims to make Peterson’s own incomprehensibility obvious to the people least willing to accept it, and as such, he writes-unlike Peterson-as plainly as possible.Īs the book is billed and presented as a take-down and critique of Peterson’s general school of thought, with particular emphasis on his messy self-help book 12 Rules for Life, it’s something of a surprise to find that the book doesn’t really begin until about seventy pages in. What Vox argues in Jordanetics is that Peterson’s twelve rules, despite the titles of their associated chapters, don’t have anything to do with what he’s talking about-and in fact, that Peterson directly contradicts his own rules in the effort of explaining them. Vox Day happens to be someone else who found the professor’s obnoxiousness a bit too much to bear, so he went ahead and published this short volume on the general phenomenon of Peterson’s overall thought, taking specific aim at the man’s latest book, 12 Rules for Life. For my own part, I also believe that what he advocates isn’t merely ineffectual change or bad advice for conservatives, but is actually outright evil and rooted in a form of Gnosticism that had all but been eradicated from the public forum until the era of modernity. I’ve written about him several times over the past year, chiefly because of how annoying his fan base is, how much favor he seems to garner with people who ought to know better, and how obviously transparent his trickery actually is. It also turns out that he has a bizarre fixation on Soviet artwork, dressing like a crazy person, and making the same frivolous comments about how complicated it is to believe in Holy Scripture over and over again. It turns out that he rather enjoys speaking engagements and that shaking his hand costs about a hundred bucks a pop. It turns out that he could use an extra five-figures a month to get some sort of glorified Rate-My-Professor alternative site running, so prospective students can figure out how Marxist their professors are. It turns out that far from being camera shy, he’s been on national Canadian television multiple times before the incident even occurred. And in his apparently firm, resolute denunciation, he seemed to be standing on all the same values that commentators just to the right of center have been advocating for in the US for years: liberty, individualism, free speech, et cetera.īut, give him a few months, or years, and it turns out that this viral professor isn’t all that alien to the public forum. Even tenured professors have felt the heat from the ardent defenders of political correctness, perhaps even more so now than when Jordan Peterson went viral a few years ago. When a professor of psychology at a state-funded university skyrockets into popularity by publicly denouncing a national policy regarding preferred pronouns, he does what most of us would presume to be is career suicide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |